CRIMINAL CHARGES FILED TODAY AGAINST 19 INDIVIDUALS, INCLUDING FORMER PRIME MINISTER JOSEPH MUSCAT

I refer you to the list on my blog for details. Compliance officers kindly note that their assets have been previously frozen by the Court. For the names, access the previous article on this blog.

MALTA FREEZES ASSETS OF ITS MOST POWERFUL LABOUR PARTY POLITICIANS IN €2bn HOSPITAL FRAUD

Indictments appear to be certain as to the Republic of Malta's most infamous politicians, leftovers from a previous corrupt Labour Party government. Compliance officers at EU banks are urged to check their client lists for every each of these names. Readers who need the names of the Maltese entities should contact me at miamicompliance@gmail.com.

TRUMP MEDIA'S ACCOUNTING FIRM CHARGED BY SEC WITH MASSIVE FRAUD

Press Release

SEC Charges Audit Firm BF Borgers and Its Owner with Massive Fraud Affecting More Than 1,500 SEC Filings

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2024-51

Washington D.C., May 3, 2024 —

The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged audit firm BF Borgers CPA PC and its owner, Benjamin F. Borgers (together, “Respondents”), with deliberate and systemic failures to comply with Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) standards in its audits and reviews incorporated in more than 1,500 SEC filings from January 2021 through June 2023. The SEC also charged the Respondents with falsely representing to their clients that the firm’s work would comply with PCAOB standards; fabricating audit documentation to make it appear that the firm’s work did comply with PCAOB standards; and falsely stating in audit reports included in more than 500 public company SEC filings that the firm’s audits complied with PCAOB standards.

To settle the SEC’s charges, BF Borgers agreed to pay a $12 million civil penalty, and Benjamin Borgers agreed to pay a $2 million civil penalty. Both Respondents also agreed to permanent suspensions from appearing and practicing before the Commission as accountants, effective immediately.

“Ben Borgers and his audit firm, BF Borgers, were responsible for one of the largest wholesale failures by gatekeepers in our financial markets,” said Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “As a result of their fraudulent conduct, they not only put investors and markets at risk by causing public companies to incorporate noncompliant audits and reviews into more than 1,500 filings with the Commission, but also undermined trust and confidence in our markets. Because investors rely on the audited financial statements of public companies when making their investment decisions, the accountants and accounting firms that audit those statements play a critical role in our financial markets. Borgers and his firm completely abandoned that role, but thanks to the painstaking work of the SEC staff, Borgers and his sham audit mill have been permanently shut down.”

The SEC’s order finds that, among other things, the Respondents failed to adequately supervise and review the work of the team performing the audits and reviews; did not properly prepare and maintain audit documentation, known as “workpapers;” and failed to obtain engagement quality reviews, without which an audit firm may not issue an audit report. According to the SEC’s order, of 369 BF Borgers clients whose public filings from January 2021 through June 2023 incorporated BF Borgers’s audits and reviews, at least 75 percent of the filings incorporated BF Borgers’s audits and reviews that did not comply with PCAOB standards.

The SEC’s order further finds that, at Benjamin Borgers’s direction, BF Borgers staff copied workpapers from previous engagements for their clients, changing only the relevant dates, and then passed them off as workpapers for the current audit period. As a result, the order finds, BF Borgers’s workpapers falsely documented work that had not been performed. Among other things, the workpapers regularly documented purported planning meetings – required to discuss a client’s business and consider any potential risk areas – that never occurred and falsely represented that both Benjamin Borgers, as the partner in charge of the engagement, and an engagement quality reviewer had reviewed and approved the work.

The SEC’s order finds that the Respondents engaged in improper professional conduct and violated, and caused violations of, the antifraud, recordkeeping, and other provisions of the federal securities laws. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings as to each of them, BF Borgers and Benjamin Borgers both consented to an order, effective immediately, pursuant to which they are ordered to pay civil penalties and are denied the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant, as discussed above. In addition, they are censured and must cease and desist from committing or causing violations of the relevant provisions of the federal securities laws.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Taryn Lewis, Jake Schmidt, and Ann Tushaus of the Chicago Regional Office, and was supervised by Brian Fa

WHY AREN'T MEDIA NAMING THE 25 PANAMANIAN LAWYERS AND PARALEGALS CHARGED IN THE MOSSACK & FONSECA MONEY LAUNDERING CASE ?

If you read the dozens of articles published, regarding the recently concluded money laundering trial against twenty seven professionals accused of massive and organized money laundering in the Republic of Panama, and exposed in the "Panama Papers" scandal, you will not find the names of the twenty-five attorneys and paralegal assistants at the M & F firm who constitute the defendants, other than the name partners. Why is that, we wonder?

Those defendants, some of whom have deleted their M & F work history from the resumes, and found suitable legal employment elsewhere, are considered extremely high-risk, and given that the presiding judge, who sits in one of the most corrupt courts in the Western Hemisphere, may choose to never hand down sentences. Nevertheless, as part of an effective risk-based anti-money laundering program that you are obligated to implement and maintain, you should learn their identities.Who knows when one of them may show up, representing the current version of Augusto Pinochet, and seek to open an account at your bank or NBFI.

Therefore, it is humbly suggested that you record those names, to insure that your frontline compliance staff, acting as gatekeepers, insures that they will not, under any circumstances, be permitted to bring their corrupt PEPs, narcotics traffickers, and sanctions evaders through your doors. You can find their names in a number of articles I have written on my blog. Use the search boxes, and type in "mossack" to access the many articles I have written about the laundrymen and -women who worked at that firm.

SHOULD COMMUNITY BANKS HIRE A FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE OFFICER TO REDUCE MONEY LAUNDERING RISKS?

We have previously detailed how community banks, for a number of reasons*, are often targeted by professional money launderers. Now they need to start thinking about an effective solution. Given budgetary restraints, engaging a retired economic crime detective from your local police department, or hiring former US military intelligence officer, might be out of reach due to the fact that a six-figure salary would be necessary to attract qualified applicants.

Perhaps outsourcing your needs for an experienced analyst to perform an enhanced due diligence investigation might be appropriate. Community banks, unlike their national and regional cousins, don't have such questions arising each day, but when they do occur, a prompt analysis by a seasoned investigator is called for ASAP. It is humbly suggested that compliance directors at community banks look for suitable candidates who are already consultants in the financial industry. My first choices might include returned DEA Special Agents, due to the fact that their experience includes the investigation of drug trafficker money laundering; another possibility is a former US Army intelligence officer. or retired CID investigator.

Given that compliance officers at community banks live in an environment where service to the customer base is the number one priority, and their opinions about suspicious transactions, even if well-reasoned, might be trumped by management for client relations reasons, former police or military, whose no-nonsense demeanor and the fact that they are external subject matter experts could result in lowering risk when their opinions are accepted, rather than argued against by management. Consider engaging an outside financial crime consultant as part of your risk-based compliance program.
__________________________________________
*" See "Community Banks at Increased Risk from Money Launderers..." March 14, 2024, Kenneth Rijock's Financial Crime Blog. https://rijock.blogspot.com/2024/03/community-banks-at-increased-risk-from.html

IS COMPLIANCE RELIANCE UPON DATABASES OF HIGH-RISK INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES A MISTAKE, AND HAS TECHNOLOGY RENDERED THEM OBOLETE AGAINST MONEY LAUNDERING AND TERRORIST FINANCING?

We note this week that a hacker group has, once again, reportedly stolen a well-known (and often relied upon) database used by compliance officers to detect unsuitable individuals and companies at account opening, and is demanding a large payment to refrain from releasing it on the Internet. Having spent many years working for two of those companies during much less complicated AML/CFT times, I understand their widespread utility as a major compliance tool. Unfortunately, the advance of technology, and greed and corruption on the part of many amoral government officials in the developing world, have, in my humble opinion, rendered their use ineffective against professional money launderers and terrorist financiers.

Laundrymen, and their terrorist financier cousins, can obtain legitimate official identity documents (passports and ID cards) from corrupt government leaders which, together with supporting official material such as drivers' licenses, real estate deeds and professional certificates, established them as legitimate individuals. These documents survive any attempts to disprove their accuracy, because they are actually genuine. How on earth can a legacy open-source database cope with such documents? The answer simply is, it cannot.

Add to the problem that proliferation of Citizenship by Investment (CBI/CIP) passport sales, conducted by needy or greedy jurisdictions, has resulted in tens of thousands of what are documents, complete with aliases and bogus places and dates of birth, which are used by money launderers and terrorist financiers to open accounts in laces where, with a nod and a wink, placement of money that should have been blocked is admitted into the global financial structure, only to traverse the world with impunity.

We now have a perfect storm for the success of money laundering, thanks to these two tools for laundrymen determined, and able, to defeat traditional compliance tactics. Only through the use of facial recognition software, backed up by an impressive image database, and supported by a vigorous enhanced due diligence investigation each time, can success at customer identification be assured, with any degree of consistency and accuracy, and I do not see that happening at most banks and non-bank financial institutions in 2024.

Therefore, please stop your blind faith that any legacy commercial-of-the-shelf database will protect your bank from professional money launderers, and their terrorist financier brethren, and move forward, using these effective tools, notwithstanding their expense, and the additional time and trouble involved, if you truly want to be an effective compliance officer at CIP, and keep out the financial barbarians at the gates, because right now, your toolbox isn't working.

COMPLIANCE OFFICERS, EXPECT A HEAVY DOSE OF PRO-BEIJING PROPAGANDA FROM HONG KONG FROM NOW ON

What you are reading is recent from the SCMP, pushing economic development and urging HK readers to ignore new laws infringing upon human rights. It smacks of 1984  and Big Brother. I think it's time to take ANY news out of Hong Kong with a healthy dose of caution, especially financial news. Remember, reporting from within HK, on Chinese companies, could get you a long term in a Mainland Chinese PRC prison; I kid you not. Look at the latest two national security laws now in place. And they are definitely not "home-grown" national security laws. These are straight from Beijing's autocratic leadership.

*******************************************************************************

Hong Kong has come a long way, in a relatively short time, since the anti-government protest chaos of 2019 plunged the city into an existential crisis and placed its future in jeopardy.

Fast forward to this week and the city marked National Security Education Day with added significance, being the first such occasion following the enactment of Hong Kong’s home-grown national security law. Officials also put the emphasis on the same day, April 15, marking the 10th anniversary of President Xi Jinping’s launch of a holistic approach to protecting the entire country amid geopolitical tensions with China’s adversaries.

While the United States and its allies continue to raise the alarm about an “erosion of Hong Kong’s rights and freedoms” with the enactment of the domestic national security legislation, the city itself is moving on to shift its focus to economic development.

That message was amplified by Xia Baolong, Beijing’s top man on Hong Kong affairs, who urged the city to embrace a “new era” and “go all out for the economy”. He also promised a string of favourable policies would be coming to give Hong Kong a boost.

The city is doing its part to raise its international profile and attract talent, with the government reporting that nearly 2,000 professionals earning HK$10 million or more a year have successfully applied over the past 12 months to live here.

The government also invited more than 2,000 people, among them so-called social media influencers and international celebrities, to the city last year to help promote tourism. It will be up to lawmakers to scrutinise how effective the spending of taxpayers’ money has been on that front.

PROMINENT AMERICAN FILM PRODUCTION COMPANY TO EXPOSE RAMPANT CORRUPTION IN THE CARIBBEAN CITIZENSHIP BY INVESTMENT INDUSTRY THROUGH LITIGATION

MSR MEDIA, a major American motion picture production company that was approved by St. Kitts & Nevis' Alternative Investment Program under the country's Citizenship by Investment (CBI) scheme, has published a Legal Notice of its intent to initiate civil litigation in the US, against several present and former Caribbean government officials, and others, for "potential violations of United States laws, including fraud, money laundering, tax evasion and corruption."

Speaking through its Producer, PHILIPPE MARTINEZ, the St. Kitts-based company has alleged that a massive program of organized fraud exists in a number of the CBI programs of the East Caribbean states, and that it has significant evidence to support that allegation. The scheme, which includes seriously discounting the price of CBI investments, while publicly claiming a share price of USD$200,000, has resulted in significant financial damage American investors, and MSR Media.

The company has indicated that its Washington D.C. counsel, MILLER CHEVALIER, has been instructed to file suit forthwith, and that the party defendants to be named include a number of individuals and companies authorized by the Kittitian government to sell CBI passport investments. Additionally, it has reportedly turned over a portion of its evidence of violations of American law to agencies of the United States Government.

FINCEN ISSUES NOTICE ON THE USE OF COUNTERFEIT U.S. PASSPORT CARDS TO PERPETRATE IDENTITY THEFT AND FRAUD SCHEMES AT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Immediate Release

April 15, 2024

WASHINGTON—Today, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), in close coordination with the Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service (DSS), issued a Notice to financial institutions on fraud schemes related to the use of counterfeit U.S. passport cards. The Notice provides an overview of typologies associated with U.S. passport card fraud, highlights select red flags to assist financial institutions in identifying and reporting suspicious activity, and reminds financial institutions of their reporting requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).

“FinCEN appreciates our partnership with DSS to highlight what is a concerning increase in the use of U.S. passport cards by illicit actors to impersonate and defraud individuals at financial institutions across the country,” said FinCEN Director Andrea Gacki. “We are issuing this Notice to help financial institutions and their customers from becoming victims to this crime, and to remind them to remain vigilant in identifying and reporting related suspicious activity.”

“The Diplomatic Security Service remains committed to protecting the American people and financial institutions from those seeking to perpetrate financial crimes by exploiting Department of State-issued identification documents,” said DSS Deputy Assistant Director for the Office of Investigations Greg Batman. “We hope this Notice will help financial institutions recognize fraudulent passport cards and their unlawful use.”

From 2018 to 2023, U.S. passport card fraud has resulted in $10 million in actual losses and $8 million in additional attempted losses with over 4,000 victims in the United States. However, DSS and other law enforcement agencies assess losses associated with U.S. passport card fraud and associated identity theft are likely significantly greater and seek increased reporting by financial institutions to identify additional illicit activity. Fraud, including financial crimes related to the use of counterfeit U.S. passport cards, is the largest source of illicit proceeds in the United States and represents one of the most significant money laundering threats to the United States, as highlighted in the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s National Money Laundering Risk Assessment, the National Strategy for Combatting Terrorist and Other Illicit Financing, and FinCEN’s Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism National Priorities.

The full Notice is available online at FIN-2024-NTC1

HOW A REFORMED MONEY LAUNDERER FOUND OUT MOSSACK AND FONSECA'S DIRTY LITTLE SECRET MORE THAN A DECADE AGO

I was trying to learn who the beneficial owners of several shell corporations formed by Mossack & Fonseca were, many years ago, when I stumbled upon this clever method of operation. They formed front companies in a number of the English-speaking tax havens in the East Caribbean, rather than their native Panama, where they might be uncovered by an enhanced due diligence sleuth. They intentionally deleted the names of the specific jurisdictions from external correspondence with banks, leaving that information to be the subject of guesswork on my past. M & F staff were quite good at their jobs, I quickly realized.

Here's the best part; they used locally admitted lawyers in these tax haven island republics and British Overseas Territories, rather than their own Panama City people. When you tried to find office addresses for these locals though, there was no brisk-and-mortar law office to be found; they were working virtually, long before such a term was fashionable for attorneys, making further inquiries impossible. there was simply no physical office to visit, let alone subpoena if you could, no legal secretaries or paralegals to interrogate, and no bloody files.

Now you know why I regarded that firm as highly effective in assisting corrupt PEPs, American tax evaders, and professional money launderers, and why it was a clear and present danger to the global banking community, as an opaque company, when using legitimate international financial institutions, increases the risk those banks may someday be held accountable by the law, or regulators, for facilitating money laundering.

IRANIAN SEIZURE OF PORTUGUESE SHIP IN THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ ADDS ONE MORE UNCERTAINTY FACTOR INTO SHIPPING AND RISK COSTS AND THEREBY FURTHER ASSISTS TBML LAUNDRYMEN

Compliance officers conducting transaction monitoring duties for international banks that have international trade clients should note that this week's illegal Iranian Navy seizure of a merchant vessel en route to India adds still more fuel to the difficulties they face daily in determining whether specific payments for shipping, including insurance and risk costs, or wholesale goods, is legitimate, or trade-based money laundering. the increased threat of a wider war in the Middle East specifically between Iran's proxy terrorist forces and the State of Israel, is now the highest it has been since the attacks on 7 October.

You should expect to find major increases in the direct and indirect costs of shipping goods to Europe, and such variable costs will fluctuate wildly, meaning there is no rhyme or reason to accurately calculate or estimate them. TBML laundrymen are having a field day placing criminal proceeds within such payments, and you will be hard-pressed to identify and interdict them. Nevertheless, by maintaining close ties on your information sources for insurance, risk management, shipping costs, and miscellaneous expenses that are now being routinely charged, you can cut through the confusion, and arrive at an accurate determination of what is legit and what is TBML. Press on in that manner to deal with any new challenges that may arise if a shooting war, or additional violence, occurs. It is your information resources that will serve you best in uncovering TBML.